Some problems do not have an immediate answer. Some problems may not ever have an understood formula, but circumstances will dictate a reasoned solution, and a life may be depending on it. My son’s medical condition defied conventional thinking, at least from my perspective. The syndrome never quite fit any typical pathology. It took some unconventional thinking and a team of experienced doctors to figure out how to attack the problem that was causing our son’s health crisis. The immunologist that headed his bone marrow transplant team, who has done hundreds of bone marrow transplants, said that he had never done one on a patient with this type of immune deficiency. What is the lesson in all this? Obviously I have had plenty of time to frame this situation in terms of how does public education contribute to our ability to creatively problem solve. I know that students spend time solving problems, but do they really develop deep problem solving experience when we concentrate on getting them ready for the PARCC exam or whatever the next accountability measure is? If we are teaching them and requiring them to problem solve in formulaic ways, will they be prepared to solve the “real” problems that come their way in a non-school environment? Schools need to be implementing programs and curriculum that have students using integrated skills, working in teams, to problem solve and create new content. Our current practice of assessment and focus on teacher accountability has forced the focus of the education system away from engaging students in way in which they practice these crucial problem solving skills.